Jason Sudeikis as Mitt Romney, left, and Alec Baldwin as Rick Perry in the GOPdebate sketch on the premiere of Saturday Night Live.
Baldwin as Perry going down for a nap. Did you buy his performance?
The early election season is in full swing and you know what that means: Cutting political satire on Saturday Night Live.
The season premiere featured Alec Baldwin as host and opened with an 11-minute send-up of the endless GOP debates. There were some choice moments (Jon Huntsman sliding into "person taking phone orders at Chinese restaurant" mode, Bobby Moynihan doing anything as Newt Gingrich) but Tina Fey as Sarah Palin this wasn't.
Our biggest problem is the second-rate portrayal of Texas governor Rick Perry by Baldwin. How is it that Baldwin, a New York native, can accurately nail the peculiar Boston patois but descend into Foghorn Leghorn territory in interpreting Perry's Texas twang? And while Baldwin is an attractive man in his own right, it turns out not everyone can rock the Perry coif with flair, and Baldwin looked jowly in comparison.
What a Perry imitator needs is that macho swagger and a cocksure smile that holds up even if the words coming out of it don't make any sense, like Will Ferrell's spot-on impression of George W. Bush. Actually, give Ferrell a better wig, a gun and a less squinty posture and he's got Rick Perry in the bag. Come on, Will, America (or at least SNL) needs you!
When it comes to playing Texan candidates, relative newbie Paul Brittain as Ron Paul rocks it, capturing Paul's cadence and body movements with a comically large head.
As a host, Baldwin was only a one-off Perry impersonator — at least I hope. What did you think of the impression? If the Perry campaign continues, who on Saturday Night Live should step into the governor's cowboy boots?
One of the oddest things about the blockbuster era we live in is that while Disney owns the rights to the majority of Marvel comic book characters, Sony Pictures owns the rights to Spider-Man and any affiliated characters. Since they’re sharing Spider-Man himself with Disney, Sony has been trying to capitalize on those rights by making stand-alone films using niche characters that only comic book fanatics would know.
Having exhausted Venom and whiffed on attempts with Morbius and Madame Web, they’re trying again with Kraven the Hunter. Also known as Sergei Kravinoff, Kraven (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is a self-styled vigilante who, as the film tells it, travels the world exacting vengeance on the truly bad people of the world. He’s the son of Nikolai (Russell Crowe), a hard-edged Russian oligarch, and brother to Dmitri (Fred Hechinger), who is relatively weak compared to the rest of his family.
The origin story has Kraven gaining his animal-like powers - including super-strength, speed, and jumping abilities - as a teenager from a mysterious serum given to him by a girl named Calypso (played as an adult by Ariana DeBose) after he was mauled by a lion. The two maintain a tenuous partnership as adults, with Calypso helping him hunt down other villains like Aleksei Sytsevich (Alessandro Nivola) and The Foreigner (Christopher Abbott).
Directed by J.C. Chandor and written by Richard Wenk, Art Marcum, and Matt Holloway, the film looks and feels enormously lazy, something made merely to hold on to potentially valuable intellectual property. Other than the tense family dynamic between the Kravinovs, little makes sense in the story. Kraven has an indecipherable moral code that has him going after poachers - because he’s part lion? - in addition to other high-powered criminals, with no clear goal except to … get back at his father?
The laziness extends to the action scenes, which feature Kraven being mostly impervious to any damage, whether it’s hand-to-hand combat, knives, or guns. The CGI-heavy scenes don’t even allow moviegoers to enjoy an R-rated bloody free-for-all, as all of the blood splatter is computer-generated, too. Since apparently one Spider-Man villain is not enough, three others make appearances with abilities that are under-explained and CGI that is poorly done.
That’s not even counting Calypso, another Spider-Man villain whose purpose in this film is nebulous at best. Her early connection with Kraven is so coincidental as to be laughable, and her continued reasons for helping him as an adult strain credulity as well. The only saving grace of her presence is that the filmmakers don’t try to shoehorn romance into the plot; perhaps they’re saving that for the (inevitable?) sequel.
Taylor-Johnson has had one of the most prolific-yet-anonymous careers in modern Hollywood, with appearances in big films like The Fall Guy, Bullet Train, and Tenet that have made very little impact. Even as the star here, he fails to hold your attention, with the story and visuals doing him no favors. DeBose has followed up her Oscar win for West Side Story with schlock like I.S.S., Argylle, and this, which doesn’t bode well for her career. At least Crowe gets to chew the scenery.
With a contractual inability to mention the name “Spider-Man,” movies like Kraven the Hunter exist in a weird area that forces filmmakers to make up stories for characters to which most people have no attachment. And just like Sony’s previous efforts, it is a very poor way to spend two hours in a movie theater; avoid at all costs.
---
Kraven the Hunter opens in theaters on December 13.