Biographer Stacy Schiff says Angelina Jolie has "the perfect look" to playCleopatra
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie made similar waves when they costarred in "Mr. andMrs. Smith"
Angelina Jolie, though sultry, is no Liz Taylor.
Angelina Jolie has been tapped to play Cleopatra in producer Scott Rudin's (No Country for Old Men, There Will Be Blood) adaptation of a new biography entitled Cleopatra: A Life.
USA Today reports that at a promotional event for the book, by Pulitzer-prize winning biographer Stacy Schiff, Schiff remarked that Brad Pitt would be a "no-brainer" for Marc Anthony. (Interestingly enough, she also told reporters that Angelina Jolie had "the perfect look" for the part, although history would suggest that the actual Cleopatra was probably not so, um, fair.)
One thing is certain — Angelina Jolie is no Elizabeth Taylor. They have their similarities — each famously seduced a married man on set; Angelina stole Brad Pitt from Jennifer Aniston on Mr. and Mrs. Smith, and Taylor swiped (and later married) Richard Burton after they costarred in Cleopatra — but Jolie just doesn't hold a candle to Liz.
I know she's gone all adoption crazy and humanitarian, but it wasn't so long ago that she was tatting Billy Bob Thornton's name on her arm, wearing blood around her neck and talking (too much) about her semi-sexual fascination with weaponry.
Taylor, on the other hand, has always been the picture of class.
Although her role in the 1963 epic was critically panned (and nearly bankrupted its studio, despite being the highest grossing film of the year), Taylor's film earned four Academy Awards and her portrayal made her name nearly synonymous with the Egyptian queen.
Tell us — will you see Jolie as Cleopatra? Are you reading the new biography?
One of the oddest things about the blockbuster era we live in is that while Disney owns the rights to the majority of Marvel comic book characters, Sony Pictures owns the rights to Spider-Man and any affiliated characters. Since they’re sharing Spider-Man himself with Disney, Sony has been trying to capitalize on those rights by making stand-alone films using niche characters that only comic book fanatics would know.
Having exhausted Venom and whiffed on attempts with Morbius and Madame Web, they’re trying again with Kraven the Hunter. Also known as Sergei Kravinoff, Kraven (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is a self-styled vigilante who, as the film tells it, travels the world exacting vengeance on the truly bad people of the world. He’s the son of Nikolai (Russell Crowe), a hard-edged Russian oligarch, and brother to Dmitri (Fred Hechinger), who is relatively weak compared to the rest of his family.
The origin story has Kraven gaining his animal-like powers - including super-strength, speed, and jumping abilities - as a teenager from a mysterious serum given to him by a girl named Calypso (played as an adult by Ariana DeBose) after he was mauled by a lion. The two maintain a tenuous partnership as adults, with Calypso helping him hunt down other villains like Aleksei Sytsevich (Alessandro Nivola) and The Foreigner (Christopher Abbott).
Directed by J.C. Chandor and written by Richard Wenk, Art Marcum, and Matt Holloway, the film looks and feels enormously lazy, something made merely to hold on to potentially valuable intellectual property. Other than the tense family dynamic between the Kravinovs, little makes sense in the story. Kraven has an indecipherable moral code that has him going after poachers - because he’s part lion? - in addition to other high-powered criminals, with no clear goal except to … get back at his father?
The laziness extends to the action scenes, which feature Kraven being mostly impervious to any damage, whether it’s hand-to-hand combat, knives, or guns. The CGI-heavy scenes don’t even allow moviegoers to enjoy an R-rated bloody free-for-all, as all of the blood splatter is computer-generated, too. Since apparently one Spider-Man villain is not enough, three others make appearances with abilities that are under-explained and CGI that is poorly done.
That’s not even counting Calypso, another Spider-Man villain whose purpose in this film is nebulous at best. Her early connection with Kraven is so coincidental as to be laughable, and her continued reasons for helping him as an adult strain credulity as well. The only saving grace of her presence is that the filmmakers don’t try to shoehorn romance into the plot; perhaps they’re saving that for the (inevitable?) sequel.
Taylor-Johnson has had one of the most prolific-yet-anonymous careers in modern Hollywood, with appearances in big films like The Fall Guy, Bullet Train, and Tenet that have made very little impact. Even as the star here, he fails to hold your attention, with the story and visuals doing him no favors. DeBose has followed up her Oscar win for West Side Story with schlock like I.S.S., Argylle, and this, which doesn’t bode well for her career. At least Crowe gets to chew the scenery.
With a contractual inability to mention the name “Spider-Man,” movies like Kraven the Hunter exist in a weird area that forces filmmakers to make up stories for characters to which most people have no attachment. And just like Sony’s previous efforts, it is a very poor way to spend two hours in a movie theater; avoid at all costs.
---
Kraven the Hunter opens in theaters on December 13.