• Home
  • popular
  • EVENTS
  • submit-new-event
  • CHARITY GUIDE
  • Children
  • Education
  • Health
  • Veterans
  • Social Services
  • Arts + Culture
  • Animals
  • LGBTQ
  • New Charity
  • TRENDING NEWS
  • News
  • City Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Home + Design
  • Travel
  • Real Estate
  • Restaurants + Bars
  • Arts
  • Society
  • Innovation
  • Fashion + Beauty
  • subscribe
  • about
  • series
  • Embracing Your Inner Cowboy
  • Green Living
  • Summer Fun
  • Real Estate Confidential
  • RX In the City
  • State of the Arts
  • Fall For Fashion
  • Cai's Odyssey
  • Comforts of Home
  • Good Eats
  • Holiday Gift Guide 2010
  • Holiday Gift Guide 2
  • Good Eats 2
  • HMNS Pirates
  • The Future of Houston
  • We Heart Hou 2
  • Music Inspires
  • True Grit
  • Hoops City
  • Green Living 2011
  • Cruizin for a Cure
  • Summer Fun 2011
  • Just Beat It
  • Real Estate 2011
  • Shelby on the Seine
  • Rx in the City 2011
  • Entrepreneur Video Series
  • Going Wild Zoo
  • State of the Arts 2011
  • Fall for Fashion 2011
  • Elaine Turner 2011
  • Comforts of Home 2011
  • King Tut
  • Chevy Girls
  • Good Eats 2011
  • Ready to Jingle
  • Houston at 175
  • The Love Month
  • Clifford on The Catwalk Htx
  • Let's Go Rodeo 2012
  • King's Harbor
  • FotoFest 2012
  • City Centre
  • Hidden Houston
  • Green Living 2012
  • Summer Fun 2012
  • Bookmark
  • 1987: The year that changed Houston
  • Best of Everything 2012
  • Real Estate 2012
  • Rx in the City 2012
  • Lost Pines Road Trip Houston
  • London Dreams
  • State of the Arts 2012
  • HTX Fall For Fashion 2012
  • HTX Good Eats 2012
  • HTX Contemporary Arts 2012
  • HCC 2012
  • Dine to Donate
  • Tasting Room
  • HTX Comforts of Home 2012
  • Charming Charlie
  • Asia Society
  • HTX Ready to Jingle 2012
  • HTX Mistletoe on the go
  • HTX Sun and Ski
  • HTX Cars in Lifestyle
  • HTX New Beginnings
  • HTX Wonderful Weddings
  • HTX Clifford on the Catwalk 2013
  • Zadok Sparkle into Spring
  • HTX Let's Go Rodeo 2013
  • HCC Passion for Fashion
  • BCAF 2013
  • HTX Best of 2013
  • HTX City Centre 2013
  • HTX Real Estate 2013
  • HTX France 2013
  • Driving in Style
  • HTX Island Time
  • HTX Super Season 2013
  • HTX Music Scene 2013
  • HTX Clifford on the Catwalk 2013 2
  • HTX Baker Institute
  • HTX Comforts of Home 2013
  • Mothers Day Gift Guide 2021 Houston
  • Staying Ahead of the Game
  • Wrangler Houston
  • First-time Homebuyers Guide Houston 2021
  • Visit Frisco Houston
  • promoted
  • eventdetail
  • Greystar Novel River Oaks
  • Thirdhome Go Houston
  • Dogfish Head Houston
  • LovBe Houston
  • Claire St Amant podcast Houston
  • The Listing Firm Houston
  • South Padre Houston
  • NextGen Real Estate Houston
  • Pioneer Houston
  • Collaborative for Children
  • Decorum
  • Bold Rock Cider
  • Nasher Houston
  • Houston Tastemaker Awards 2021
  • CityNorth
  • Urban Office
  • Villa Cotton
  • Luck Springs Houston
  • EightyTwo
  • Rectanglo.com
  • Silver Eagle Karbach
  • Mirador Group
  • Nirmanz
  • Bandera Houston
  • Milan Laser
  • Lafayette Travel
  • Highland Park Village Houston
  • Proximo Spirits
  • Douglas Elliman Harris Benson
  • Original ChopShop
  • Bordeaux Houston
  • Strike Marketing
  • Rice Village Gift Guide 2021
  • Downtown District
  • Broadstone Memorial Park
  • Gift Guide
  • Music Lane
  • Blue Circle Foods
  • Houston Tastemaker Awards 2022
  • True Rest
  • Lone Star Sports
  • Silver Eagle Hard Soda
  • Modelo recipes
  • Modelo Fighting Spirit
  • Athletic Brewing
  • Rodeo Houston
  • Silver Eagle Bud Light Next
  • Waco CVB
  • EnerGenie
  • HLSR Wine Committee
  • All Hands
  • El Paso
  • Avenida Houston
  • Visit Lubbock Houston
  • JW Marriott San Antonio
  • Silver Eagle Tupps
  • Space Center Houston
  • Central Market Houston
  • Boulevard Realty
  • Travel Texas Houston
  • Alliantgroup
  • Golf Live
  • DC Partners
  • Under the Influencer
  • Blossom Hotel
  • San Marcos Houston
  • Photo Essay: Holiday Gift Guide 2009
  • We Heart Hou
  • Walker House
  • HTX Good Eats 2013
  • HTX Ready to Jingle 2013
  • HTX Culture Motive
  • HTX Auto Awards
  • HTX Ski Magic
  • HTX Wonderful Weddings 2014
  • HTX Texas Traveler
  • HTX Cifford on the Catwalk 2014
  • HTX United Way 2014
  • HTX Up to Speed
  • HTX Rodeo 2014
  • HTX City Centre 2014
  • HTX Dos Equis
  • HTX Tastemakers 2014
  • HTX Reliant
  • HTX Houston Symphony
  • HTX Trailblazers
  • HTX_RealEstateConfidential_2014
  • HTX_IW_Marks_FashionSeries
  • HTX_Green_Street
  • Dating 101
  • HTX_Clifford_on_the_Catwalk_2014
  • FIVE CultureMap 5th Birthday Bash
  • HTX Clifford on the Catwalk 2014 TEST
  • HTX Texans
  • Bergner and Johnson
  • HTX Good Eats 2014
  • United Way 2014-15_Single Promoted Articles
  • Holiday Pop Up Shop Houston
  • Where to Eat Houston
  • Copious Row Single Promoted Articles
  • HTX Ready to Jingle 2014
  • htx woodford reserve manhattans
  • Zadok Swiss Watches
  • HTX Wonderful Weddings 2015
  • HTX Charity Challenge 2015
  • United Way Helpline Promoted Article
  • Boulevard Realty
  • Fusion Academy Promoted Article
  • Clifford on the Catwalk Fall 2015
  • United Way Book Power Promoted Article
  • Jameson HTX
  • Primavera 2015
  • Promenade Place
  • Hotel Galvez
  • Tremont House
  • HTX Tastemakers 2015
  • HTX Digital Graffiti/Alys Beach
  • MD Anderson Breast Cancer Promoted Article
  • HTX RealEstateConfidential 2015
  • HTX Vargos on the Lake
  • Omni Hotel HTX
  • Undies for Everyone
  • Reliant Bright Ideas Houston
  • 2015 Houston Stylemaker
  • HTX Renewable You
  • Urban Flats Builder
  • Urban Flats Builder
  • HTX New York Fashion Week spring 2016
  • Kyrie Massage
  • Red Bull Flying Bach
  • Hotze Health and Wellness
  • ReadFest 2015
  • Alzheimer's Promoted Article
  • Formula 1 Giveaway
  • Professional Skin Treatments by NuMe Express

    The countdown continues: 70-61

    Ranking every Radiohead song from "worst" to "first"

    Jim Beviglia
    Jan 30, 2010 | 12:00 am

    After taking on warhorses like the Beatles, the Stones, and Springsteen on the music site JamsBio Magazine, we've chosen Radiohead as the first modern band to warrant a worst-to-first countdown of their music, and the inaugural ranking on CultureMap. Check back each week as our obsessive list-maker Jbev counts down all of the band’s album cuts and gives his reasons for the rankings, and also be prepared to tell him why he’s wrong in the comments section. It’s "Everything In Its Right Place: The Ultimate Radiohead Countdown."

    Today's countdown looks at the rankings from #70-61. Tune in each Saturday as JBev continues his countdown to number 1!

    Song 70: “Stop Whispering”

    Album: "Pablo Honey"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    The company line is that this song off "Pablo Honey" was a tribute the the Pixies, but the end result ended up sounding like the band doing U2. Ironic, of course, because U2 would later claim that they were partly inspired to get out of their late '90s rut by the challenge of taking on Radiohead for the unofficial title of the world’s best band.

    Thom Yorke’s wails in the chorus certainly sound like the countless cries to the heavens by Bono, and Colin Greenwood’s bassline even has an Adam Clayton-esque feel to it. The song itself seems to be the strangled cry of a frustrated adolescent who wants the adult world to hear his voice, although you could also read it as a metaphor for an entire generation yearning to bust out of their shackles. Either way, the soaring refrains and those big Yorke bellows drive the point home awful hard, tipping their hand a bit too heavily.

    Things get much better in the closing minutes of the song, when the band goes on one of the extended freakouts that they do so well. As a matter of fact, since this was the first album, you might say it was a precursor to the instrumental ruckuses to come. Jonny Greenwood tears at Ed O’Brien’s unyielding arpeggios, while Phil Selway kicks the beat into another gear. After about a minute or so, Yorke comes back in with the refrain, but he’s buffeted about by the din and has to serrate his own voice to get back into the sonic picture.

    That unhinged outro quite ingeniously reveals the message that the first part of the song works overtime to convey. Radiohead would take a lesson from this, and apply it often in years to come.

    Song 69: "Sulk"

    Album: "The Bends"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    Radiohead improved so drastically between albums one and two that it’s hard to find any evidence of the band that made "Pablo Honey" on "The Bends." “Sulk” is the one song that feels like a bit of a hangover, and, as such, is probably the weakest song on the sophomore effort.

    What it does have going for it is some of Yorke’s most acrobatic singing. Because, especially in recent work, he tends to use studio manipulation to make that voice sound like anything other than it actually does, it’s easy to forget what a hauntingly beautiful instrument it can be. The chorus of “Sulk” is an example of that; you can get lost following him into the rarefied air to the point that it doesn’t really matter what the words are. You believe they’re the truth on faith.

    Kudos also goes to the rhythm section of Selway and Colin Greenwood for giving this one a little bounce that veers it away from the pedestrian. The song itself falls into the category of relatively unmemorable, however. It was apparently written by Yorke at a tender age and inspired by a one-man killing spree in England in 1987, but little of that makes it through in the finished song.

    The overall sound is very reminiscent of "Pablo Honey." Only the guitar sound in the instrumental break, that lyrical yet grinding sound that the band locked onto during "The Bends" and "OK Computer," gives this song the punch necessary to keep it from feeling like too much of a leftover.

    Song 68: “Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors”

    Album: "Amnesiac"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    An experimental song that’s fascinating if not lovable, this track off "Amnesiac" gives away its bizarre intentions as soon as you read the title. You have to give the band credit though; the song does sound like some crazed fever dream where you can imagine yourself in an endless hallway surrounded by doors of every shape and size. That dream becomes nightmarish when you realize, as Thom squeaks out in the last lines with his voice pounded by the rhythm beyond all recognition, “And there are trap doors/That you can’t come back from.”

    That’s pretty eerie stuff. The rhythm, part hip-hop and part industrial accident, sounds like a film projector come to life and running amok. Indeed there is a chase scene vibe to the whole song; at times the beat drops away, leaving just some computer squiggles subtly ascending heavenward, only to be put in jeopardy when that thunderous clamor returns.

    This is the challenge that the band presents audiences. They have the nerve to present music that’s downright ugly if it serves a greater purpose. The trust that their audience will follow them through such uncharted territory eventually pays off for all. Those that get scared away by songs like “Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors,” well, it’s their loss.

    Song 67: "Ripcord"

    Album: "Pablo Honey"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    It’s a testament to a good set of lyrics that they can take on many meanings other than their intended one. I, for one, was flummoxed when, in doing research for this project, I found out that this song was about the band’s feeling of helplessness in dealing with record companies.

    Normally, you’d get a bunch of more-money-more-problems clichés to illustrate that point, but there is an almost existential feel to the malaise on display here. Indeed, the “politics of power” could be flexed by just about any giant industry with a stranglehold on the individuals that make their business work. Favorite line: “The answer to your prayers/We’ll drop you anywhere.”

    This is some of the toughest straightforward rock that the band has ever recorded. Phil Selway, in particular, shines here, thumping his way through all of the big guitars and giving the song a beating heart amidst the din.

    Alas, the quiet/loud dynamic is way too overdone in the verses, producing a jarring effect. The production lapse provides enough of a blemish to knock this otherwise underrated offering from "Pablo Honey" to a spot further down this list than it might have attained otherwise.

    Song 66: "Reckoner"

    Album: "In Rainbows"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    I have a feeling I’ll take some heat for this one. “Reckoner” is at times beautiful, at times inscrutable, and always interesting. But I always have the feeling listening to it as if I’ve been dropped into the middle of some unfamiliar place without my bearings. While that can be exhilarating for a short while, it can turn maddening after too long.

    The trancelike repetition of the track is by no means a deal breaker, especially since the groove onto which the band locks is so alluring. It’s like the sound of the funky drummer being nibbled at by meddlesome guitars. Every time you feel the urge to shake your hips, a sudden mood swing in the music stops you in your tracks.

    Yorke’s singing is at his most ethereal here, and it’s one of those songs where the lyrics (mostly abstract wordplay like “bittersweet distractor”) are irrelevant compared to the way he’s singing it. If anything, he ultimately controls the mood of the song as much as the music.

    To me, “Reckoner” never quite delivers the payoff that its beautiful music promises. Maybe it wasn’t meant to. Maybe my wanting more from it is my own hangup. But I do, and that means, beauty and all, it’s a almost-but-not-quite moment in the band’s catalog to me.

    Song 65: “Dollars and Cents”

    Album: "Amnesiac"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    Ominous yet seductive, “Dollars And Cents” insinuates itself into your brain and leaves some unsettling vibes once it’s there. The groove is insistent yet ever-changing, thanks to some hiccups in the beat now and then and the subtle adding and subtracting of musical layers along the way.

    At one point, everything drops away except the bass, drums and vocal, and the song achieves a hypnotic simplicity amidst all the trickiness. It’s impossible to wrap your ahead around everything that’s going on here, even with a thousand listens, which could be a selling point or a negative depending on how you look at it.

    Thom Yorke’s lyrics, meant to be a depiction of an average individual’s being manipulated by global economic powers, are no easy read either. The point of view seems to be always shifting between lonely cries for help and a Big Brother-like power that alternates sloganeering with vague threats, culminating with the ultimate power trip: “We are the dollars and cents/And the pounds and pence...We are going to crack your little souls.”

    Throw in the fact that the song basically eschews verses and choruses for a shapeshifting structure, and you begin to understand that the band was operating at a pretty high degree of difficulty here, as they were on most of "Amnesiac," for that matter. Points for ambition, no doubt, even if the end result is more elusive than elucidating.

    Song 64: "Bodysnatchers"

    Album: "In Rainbows"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    Can I start this write-up off with a rant? I can? Thanks. Who in the wide, wide world of sports came up with the CD packaging for "In Rainbows"? Whatever its artistic merit may be, it’s impracticality is staggering. Once I turn the thing nine different ways to find the latch to open it, 37 different leaflets fall out, like when you try to open a magazine in a store and the subscription cards all come floating down. And don’t get me started on getting this whole menagerie back together once I’ve completed listening. It’s a full-scale travesty, folks. Who’s with me? Anyone?

    OK, I promise not to hold that against “Bodysnatchers,” one of the most propulsive and bruising tracks the band has ever given us. That fuzzed-up guitar riff is unhinged enough to keep the Krautrock backbeat from being too rigid, allowing for the emotion of the song to show itself. I also love the way that the riff disappears at one point, ratcheting up the tension before it comes barreling back in with even more reckless force. It’s a clinic in song structure, but it only works because the band has the chops to pull it off.

    Paranoia spreads through the lyrics, which makes the hell-bent force of the music even more affecting, as if it’s trying to bust through all the unseen constraints that Thom Yorke feels. Yorke claims to have been inspired by old ghost stories for this song, but, in a way, his narrative is even more sinister because the threat appears to be no apparition. “I’m a lie,” he sings, a moment of self-revelation made chilling by the fact that, as the lyric implies, he seems to have become this way through no fault of his own.

    As he wails, “I’ve seen it coming” over and over at song’s end, we know that he was still helpless to stop all of it. The song might have worked a tad more if there was something more concrete behind all of the terror, if we knew the force Yorke thought was behind all of this soul-eradicating. We might not know exactly who the “Bodysnatchers” are, but the song that tells of their exploits certainly packs a hell of a wallop.

    Song 63: “We Suck Young Blood”

    Album: "Hail to the Thief"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    This track deserves special mention because it might be the creepiest song in the band’s repertoire. That’s saying something, because Radiohead has released more than their fair share of dark and disturbing tracks. “We Suck Young Blood,” with it’s dirge-like beat that sounds like a chain-gang in hell and Jonny Greenwood’s Ondes Martenot conjuring up spirits best left in the underworld, is so studiedly spooky that it could make John Carpenter flinch.

    What does it say then about the band’s thoughts on Hollywood that the inspiration for this song is apparently the way that La-La Land fetishizes young talent at the expense of all else, only to discard that talent once the past-due date has been reached. It admittedly is a story that’s been told many times before, albeit rarely in such an aggressively macabre manner.

    Might the song have worked at a different pace with Yorke pitching out his producer-like one-liners with a bit more pep and panache, instead of drawling them out like he’s getting a throat exam? Perhaps, but then it wouldn’t be Radiohead, now would it? Perhaps it’s not for all tastes, but “We Suck Young Blood” is ballsy in its unfettered weirdness.

    Song 62: "House of Cards"

    Album: "In Rainbows"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    When "In Rainbows" was released, there was a lot of talk about it being a kinder, gentler Radiohead. I suppose that was because the ratio of slow-to-fast songs was a bit higher than usual, but, looking back, it seems like a facile yet inaccurate assessment. Slow songs they may be, but they’re still spiced up with enough out-of-left-field eccentricity to make them seem anything but kind and gentle. I mean, we ain’t exactly talkin’ about Jack Johnson material here.

    Nor do I think their fans would ever truly want a kinder, gentler Radiohead, because it somehow implies that they’ve been defanged somewhat. “House Of Cards” is certainly gentler in that it has a mellow vibe, what with the delicately plucked guitar and the ticking beat. But then squalls of sound make their way into the mix, throwing everything a bit off-kilter.

    And while the melody that Thom Yorke sings is pretty in an ambling sort of way, the lyrics he sings aren’t so neatly categorized. For one thing, it’s bracing to hear him sing something as bluesy and blunt as the opening lines: “I don’t want to be your friend/I just want to be your lover.” That’s as direct a couplet as he’s ever uttered.

    But the lyrics also speak somewhat to the darker themes that walk hand-in-hand with sexual longing, like betrayal and self-deception. Yorke exhorts his lover to “Fall off the table/And get swept under.” But his closing cries of “Denial” hint at the consequences such behavior might bring forth.

    So even if “House Of Cards” seems like a quiet and unassuming change of pace from a band more associated with making a racket, the song still roils up quite an upheaval in its wake. Don’t look for Radiohead in the Easy Listening section anytime soon.

    Song 61: “How Do You Do?”

    Album: "Pablo Honey"

    Adobe Flash Required for flash player.

    This blast off "Pablo Honey" is a fascinating glimpse into a road not taken by the band. What if Radiohead’s members had come of age during the late '70s, when punk was the music of choice for so many teens that were looking for answers they weren’t finding in school or at home or in their own head? “How Do You?” is the sound of Radiohead as an incipient punk band, and, no surprise, it turns out they would have been damn good at that too.

    Thom Yorke gives the lyrics his best Johnny Rotten sneer, but the dead-on portraiture in the lyrics of a rich kid who’s been given the world but deserves so much less, combined with the shambolic guitar crunch, suggests none other than The Replacements. Only a brief guitar beheading at song’s end suggests the more avant-garde path the band eventually followed.

    Because punk wasn’t quite as lived-in by the band as the music with which they were most familiar, “How Do You?” sounds more like a loving imitation than the band filtering the influences through their own sensibilities and coming up with an original animal. But it is a spirited imitation nonetheless, Radiohead playing with a vigor and abandon that’s truly hard to find elsewhere in their songbook.

    SONGS 60-51 >>

    <

    unspecified
    news/entertainment
    CULTUREMAP EMAILS ARE AWESOME
    Get Houston intel delivered daily.

    Movie Review

    Heartfelt movie The Life of Chuck adapts optimistic Stephen King story

    Alex Bentley
    Jun 13, 2025 | 5:30 pm
    Tom Hiddleston in The Life of Chuck
    Photo courtesy of NEON
    Tom Hiddleston in The Life of Chuck.

    Just like actors, once a filmmaker becomes known for a certain genre, it can be difficult to escape that pigeonholing. Writer/director Mike Flanagan has worked for 20 years in both film and television, and literally every project he’s done has been related to horror. He’s finally breaking out with The Life of Chuck, which is ironically based on a short story of the same name by Stephen King.



    Told in three chapters in reverse order, the film is almost impossible to describe without giving away its magic. The first section centers on Marty (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a teacher grappling, like everyone around him, with what seems to be the world falling apart. He’s comforted to a degree by reuniting with his ex-wife, Felicia (Karen Gillan), but is also baffled by multiple ads touting the retirement of Charles “Chuck” Krantz (Tom Hiddleston) after “39 great years.”

    The second section consists of little more than a slightly younger Chuck happening upon Taylor (The Pocket Queen), a drummer busking on a street corner, giving Chuck and a younger woman, Janice (Annalise Basso), the inspiration to start dancing. The final section goes back to the childhood of Chuck (Benjamin Pajak), where he’s raised by his grandparents (Mark Hamill and Mia Sara), discovers dance as an outlet, and wonders about various small mysteries.

    Flanagan finds a way to deliver a lot of story with relatively little effort. Using a wry narrator (Nick Offerman), a limited number of locations, and a series of great small performances, he creates an intriguing premise with few straightforward answers. The structure of the film is designed to confuse the viewer until just the right moment, and the revelation forces you to reexamine everything that came before.

    The biggest accomplishment by Flanagan is making what are essentially three short films and having each of them resonate equally. The film contains elements of science fiction, although the first section may hit a bit too close to home for some of those watching. All three sections, though, have a heartwarming bent to them that sells their central idea without becoming overly saccharine.

    To do so, each of the characters have to connect in a short amount of time. The casting of the film is crucial, and not only does that department succeed with the main roles, but a series of small roles are filled expertly as well. Carl Lumbly as a funeral home owner, David Dastmalchian and Harvey Guillen as parents of students, Matthew Lillard as Marty’s neighbor, Q’orianka Kilcher as Chuck’s wife, and Jacob Tremblay as a teenage Chuck are just a few of the recognizable actors that do yeoman’s work in their brief time on screen.

    Hiddleston is only prominently featured in the second chapter, but his performance there and in small glimpses throughout makes a big impression. Ejiofor is given the star turn in the first chapter and he absolutely kills, both in moments by himself and in scenes with Gillan, with whom he has great chemistry. Hamill, making a rare non-voiceover appearance outside of the Star Wars universe, and Sara, in her first notable role in 11 years, are also very memorable in the final chapter.

    The Life of Chuck is a film that’s filled with emotion, but the full impact of the story is not felt until the final moments. It has a mysterious journey that is initially frustrating, but the performances keep the film going until it gets to its satisfying payoff.

    ---

    The Life of Chuck is now playing in theaters.

    moviesfilm
    news/entertainment
    Loading...