On Dec. 17, 2010, a Tunisian street vendor named Mohamed Bouazizi had his produce confiscated by police because he couldn’t afford to bribe them. Eyewitnesses allege a government official slapped and spat at him, taking away his scale and cart.
Having gone into debt to purchase the goods and having no other means of support, he went to the governor, who refused to see him. He was seen a few minutes later in traffic, screaming “How do you expect me to make a living?” and waving around a gasoline can. He then doused himself with fuel and lit himself on fire.
Before that day this act, known as self-immolation, had gained international attention in the 1960s when Buddhist monks began setting themselves on fire to protest their treatment by the South Vietnamese government. It is not a calculated political decision but an act of desperation, and its hopelessness can mobilize people to action.
Bouazizi died on January 4, 2011; 10 days later, Tunisia’s President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali fled to Saudi Arabia amid country-wide protests. Ben Ali had ruled Tunisia for more than two decades and lost control of it in less than a month, all because of a routine government shakedown.
This quickly became the new norm in the Middle East, as entrenched regimes found themselves swallowed and toppled by their own people. Just 11 days after Ben Ali’s exit from Tunisia, protesters began gathering across Egypt.
Hosni Mubarak attempted to quash the protests using force, propaganda campaigns, political maneuvering, stalling tactics and eventually, live ammunition. Sixteen days passed before Mubarak resigned his position, ending his 30-year stint as President on Feb. 11.
It has been one year since Mohamed Bouazizi’s initial act of desperation in Tunisia, widely regarded as the start of the Arab Spring.
At each stage of the series of uprisings now known as the Arab Spring, social media was integral to the coordination and planning of protests, allowing activists to map crises in realtime and disseminate critical survival information, such as the location of sniper’s nests and military check points.
It also gave protestors a global voice to broadcast information to the world at large, contradicting the damage control and misinformation spewing from their dictators.
But while progressive forces were building networks of solidarity, the security forces and dictators they were mobilizing against were also using social media to monitor dissent and learn from their neighboring sovereigns’ mistakes.
Saudi Arabia led with an overwhelming military presence to strangle protest while announcing concessions and reforms intended to mollify the country. Other countries have cracked down viciously; the United Nations and Human Rights Watch both estimate the death toll in Syria to be around 5,000 and climbing. Libya’s civil war was protracted, with Muammar Gaddafi growing increasingly bloodthirsty, hostile and bizarre as the long siege wore on and the rebels closed in on Tripoli.
The entire world watched protestors getting pepper sprayed, beaten, groped, stomped, and their skulls fractured by projectiles; the aggregate of footage led a lot of people over the weeks and months to recall the George Orwell quote: “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”
It has been a year since Bouazizi’s initial act of desperation, and while revolution hasn’t taken hold in every country that is in need of it, it has still provided a template, a living example of people retaking control of the government — which fascinates the citizens of the world and terrifies those who’d like to control it.
Only time will tell if repressive regimes adapt to shut down dissent all the more quickly, developing such sophisticated methods of crowd (and media) control they no longer need to fear revolt, or if this year proves indeed to be the beginning of an entirely new world.